WEBSITE NAVIGATION

 

Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke: Operators of the Ottawa-Toronto-Montreal-(Beijing) Triangle of Power and Wealth

Expect “Severe Disruptions” to Their Lives 

© 2009 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.

Barrister & Solicitor 

 

The East-West Corridor of Diplomacy serves the purpose of recording, transcribing, documenting, archiving and delivering to Fiefdom treatise recipients that which impacts the future of Canada – a country that soon will be absent trans-generational corruption, extreme nepotism-patronage exclusion and as certainly Chinese de facto governance and militarization.  

 

 

Chairman Bernanke used his time in the diplomatic corridor to full advantage for democracy, rule of law and human rights when delivering his November 16, 2009 speech and during a Q&A at the Economic Club of New York.  This forum is arguably the most powerful center in the world for the investing uber-wealthy and those operating large and multi-nations.  Thus him employing the lexicon in such distinguished company repeatedly to red flag his remarks as relevant to the war against Chinada, many of whom are already coalition partners, is a signal how galvanized and tenaciously resolved U.S. movers and shakers are in fixing Canada’s systemic dysfunctionalities and containing and neutralizing China’s imperialism.  

 

The Chairman of this most central and high profile institution has been a regular diplomacy participant.  He was recently nominated for a 2009 Geo Award for his contributions.   They are documented in: 

 

 

Undeniably the Federal Reserve is integral to the formation and oversight of the Custodian-in-Council's trillion dollar trust.  

 

While he delivers his speech he red flags a phrase that encapsulates what the coalition is about to do to those who defied its membership.  He executes a CBS Maneuver [@ 3:54] to “severe disruptions” – what’s going to happen to the operators of the Ottawa-Toronto-Montreal-(Beijing) triangle of power and wealth as has been stressed so many times before. 

 

View video 

 

He continues to underscore to his powerful audience his institution’s commitment to stated objectives, executing multiple lexiconic red flags during his Q&A.  The first is a Bernanke Maneuver, or namesake gesture [@ 0:30], when beginning to answer the question “What information would you now like to have that you do not yet have that would help you?”– his way of reminding all those watching and in the coalition's information loop that he, his colleagues at the Federal Reserve and everyone in the Obama administration and in the legislative branch are helping in every way they can. 

 

He executes another one when answering a question about whether he had read a recent speech of the Governor of the Bank of England [@ 3:09]: “I always read Mervin's speeches” – to confirm he reviews all Fiefdom treatise authorship.  All partners around the world do because it is a way to maintain the highest level of diplomatic synergy and sense of community purpose they’ve developed over the years and trace benchmark success achievement. 

 

He executes a double gesture to the question “If the American economy moves ahead along a moderate economic growth path, as you suggest [5:50: Cl.M., Newman M.]” – his commitment to ensure that Canada’s economy in no way falters during and after covert regime change. 

 

To “Would you respond through quantitative restrictive measures or through a selective approach?”, he executes [@ 6:14] another namesake gesture to red flag his answer as geo-relevant: “Well, Henry you should know you've just introduced perhaps the most difficult problem in monetary policy of the decade, which is how to deal with asset bubbles” – him identifying the threat Chinada poses as exceptionally problematic to address; but that in no way has deterred the coalition from challenging the menace.  

 

At the end of the answer he states, “Again I think with respect to monetary policy I think we can say ‘never say never and keep an open mind’; we have to continue to evaluate all these aspects of the economy going forward [9:13: Cl.M. X3]” – his way of emphasizing the need for constant monitoring of what happens during the deconstruction and reconstitution of the Canadian economic system to mitigate downsides and maximize benefits.  

 

He finishes answering another question with “Even though jobs are like to be created next year, um, I'm concerned the unemployment rate might remain quite high by the end of the year [11:42: Cl.M.]”.  He is drawing the less culpable malfeasants’ attention to what has been said over and over about what they can expect in the ‘new Canada’ – having their employment terminated, their appointments revoked and blacklisted in perpetuity to force them into a poverty lifestyle as punishment for what was inflicted on millions of Canadians: Coalition Partners Put the Minimally Guilty and Unwaveringly Loyal on Notice What Awaits Them After Covert Regime Change. 

 

He executes a namesake gesture to “[12:22: B.M.] I understand what Chairman Volker, is concerned about”. He’s referring to the chairman of President Obama’s inner circle Economic Recovery Advisory Board and his commitment to achieving stated objectives: President Obama and Senior Economics Advisor Paul Volcker: Coercive Diplomacy and Underscoring Reform, Accountability and Chinese Military Eviction is Underway; and Reaction to Chinada’s Latest Belligerent Diplomacy

 

When he hears another geo-relevant question he executes another namesake gesture as follows: “How critical is it for Secretary Geitner and Congress to get the fiscal house in order so you can get the monetary house in order?” [15:26: Bernanke]; the red flag here is to underscore the need for a complete top-to-bottom house cleaning north of the 49th Parallel. 

 

Another namesake gesture is employed here: “Well Henry [19:01: B.M.] there -- you're absolutely right, the financial concentration has increased and it's quite large in some areas, categories. There are two reasons why we care about financial concentrations. One is the traditional ant-trust issues: is competition being hampered by concentration in particular markets or categories of firms?.”  The Chairman directs attention to the main economic pillar of policy and decision making going back to the early Trudeau era discovered during the Fiefdom treatise research project: the monopolization of the economy, the loss of independence in institutions of accountability that prevent it and the resulting concentration of wealth that led to massive hoarding and systemic embezzlement: Revisiting Clandestine Economy Monopolization and Wealth Plundering: The Costs to All Canadians and Upper Income Bracket Fiefdom Treatise Recipients.   

 

View video

 

 

 

WEBSITE NAVIGATION

Make a Free Website with Yola.